However, of the few ideas I did comprehend, I can say I can appreciate how he’s come to his logic, but I can’t say I agree with the pretense that evil derives from g I don’t even think I could give a proper review, as that would require me to have a general grasp of what I just read. Even if it will always leave me intellectually dissatisfied, I may never determine whether I think that dissatisfaction is due to my limitations, to his I’m adding a star to my previous review. It reduces man to the level of a living organism pure and simple. Who can fail to see that in our humanitarian expeditions Poorly written in general. Overall a challenging read, but great if you want some more foundational philosophy to draw from.
A Philosophy of Evil. He shows how our prevailing ethical principles serve ultimately to reinforce an ideology of the status quo, and fail to provide a framework for an effective understanding of the concept of evil. Ethics is founded on Badiou’s philosophy more generally, and like his other writings follows the form of what he calls the “general truth procedure. This is fairly impossible to do in the manner he approached it in my opinion and needed much more fleshing out as the idea is a very old one that still deserves a lot of discussion. Tasos Tsakiroglou 10 April Man is the being who is capable of recognising himself as a victim. I find myself in an unfortunate circumstance while reviewing this book.
Oct 27, Devrim rated it it was ok Shelves: This Side of Evil.
As Badiou himself makes clear in the “Preface to the English Edition,” his Ethics is mobilized by two, not always consistent desires: Because of its universal underpinnings, ethics is badiou ethics an essay on the understanding of evil to address the singularity of situations as such, “which is the obligatory starting poing of all properly human action. As he points out, these are Family photographs as art photography, collecting, history, nostalgia Aug 3 And the “other” is always inadequate to its role as other, because there is as much about it that it is “same”.
The Clamor of Being, and Ethics. Another reminder of the astonishing contribution of European Jews to American life. The heart of this framework is the universal human subject. Our consensual ethical norms amount to nothing more than a jumbled confusion of legalistic formalism, scandalised opinion, and theological mystification.
Ethics must find its foundation in the Same. I don’t think this part of his thinking colors everything else. Claims to “horseshoe theory” will likely surface.
Badiou’s relative anonymity in the English-speaking world probably results in part from the difficulty of his thought—which draws heavily on mathematics especially set theory as well as Lacanian psychoanalysis and Althusserian marxism—and in part from his distinctly un-American political profile as an ex-Maoist and unrepentant radical militant.
Badiou is probably the most famous French philosopher not to have a major following in the Anglo-American academy—although this situation is surely in the process of changing, with several translations recently published or in the works and with Badiou receiving badiou ethics an essay on the understanding of evil from Z;akiz;akek, one of the great contemporary mediators of French theory.
Can be traced back to Emmanuel Levinas rather than Kant. Nevertheless, I still limped through the text, stopping every sentence or two to wrap my head around what Badiou was proposing.
To think of Evil as being constructed from Good or even visa versa strikes me as a hopeless quest. It is also its dependence on happiness and the absence of death.
Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil – Alain Badiou – Google Books
Biopolitical Utopianism in Educational Theory. As such, this is a read that is steeped in references, albeit being a commissioned more accessible version of his larger work. That said, it IS worth doing that research for the sake of the book, and if you’re a postfreudian nut or seasoned ontologist there’s no excuse whatsoever to avoid Ethics.
George Steinmetz – – Sociological Theory 27 1: My thoughts on the basics of Badiou are here: Ethics functions as a nihilistic “understudy” to this “necessity.
A universally recognisable human subject is proposed possessing rights that are in some badiou ethics an essay on the understanding of evil natural.
Here ethics is at the junction of two only apparently contradictory drives: There’s a lot of gloss over his ontology and his Badiou ethics an essay on the understanding of evil fundamentals, which is appropriate I think but if you’ve never even heard of a ‘multiple set’ or a ‘mirror stage’ you might want to do a spot of research before picking up Ethics; I recommended it to some friends who had little experience with philosophy or critical theory and the exciting concepts for them all got completely eclipsed by intimidatingly unfamiliar phrases.
Rather than seek out the terms of a new politics of collective liberation, they have, in sum, adopted as their own the principles of the established ‘Western’ order. Dec 12, Gary Bruff rated it it was ok Shelves: Overall a challenging read, but great if you want some more foundational philosophy to draw from.
Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil
The positive and the good are secondary, as that which would protect him from evil. To the unbearable character of the latter as a sight for the living? Ethical questions dominate current political and academic agendas.
Every collective will to the Good creates Evil.
But Levinas’ examination of the phenomenology of the experience of the other the face, the caress is inadequate to the task he sets for it. Does the Other Exist? Badiou sememangnya telah mencerai-beraikan pondasi etika semasa yang digelarnya Ideologi Etika dengan hujatan terhadap prinsipnya berasaskan kesediaadaan Kejahatan oleh Kant dan yang Lain Levinas. Poorly written in general.
Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil by Alain Badiou
I don’t even think I could give a proper review, as that would require me to have a general grasp of what I just read. No eBook available Amazon.
Clearly, we must not stick-to-it in the face of all evidence and reasoning, especially when these compel us to see some ideas as well worth abandoning. Marianna Papastephanou – – Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 4: Good is defined simply as that which intervenes visibly against this Evil.
There’s a lot of gloss over his ontology and his Lacanian fundamentals, which is appropriate I think but if you’ve never even heard of a ‘multiple set’ or a ‘mirror stage’ you might want to do a spot of research before picking up Ethics; I recommended it to some friends w This one is written by the polemicist Badiou not the set theorist Badiou – intended for a more badiou ethics an essay on the understanding of evil audience it’s written with a flourish which would be exasperating in a more scholarly work and is extremely readable for it.
Akhmatova rarely missed a Shostakovich premiere. Petruschka Schaafsma – – Peeters. The Origins of Adherent Beauty Part 3: The famous words of Martin Niemoeller have a moral authority Badiou’s nifty little book does not touch: In addition to several novels, plays and political essays, he has published a number of major philosophical works, including Theory of the SubjectBeing and EventManifesto for Philosophyand Gilles Deleuze.
Apr 22, Meru rated it liked it. From inside the book.